<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Comments for page &quot;What is the Total Proposed LNG Export from the USA&quot;</title>
		<link>http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/forum/t-583496/what-is-the-total-proposed-lng-export-from-the-usa</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;What is the Total Proposed LNG Export from the USA&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 11:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/forum/t-583496#post-1608200</guid>
				<title>Excellent post, a few small edits</title>
				<link>http://abarrelfull.wikidot.com/forum/t-583496/what-is-the-total-proposed-lng-export-from-the-usa#post-1608200</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>KevinCassidy</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1439964</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Excellent post, very interesting and topical information. A small quibble, I believe the Sabine Pass capacity is closer to 8MMTPA total for the 2 trains, with a potential further expansion of 3 identical trains to a total of 24MMTPA. Also, unless I am misreading it, I believe the US total in tons is incorrect. Anyway, this would make the total for export closer to 20-21% of the total market, and these are just currently-progressing projects. I believe there are 3-4 smaller plants in the works, but those are in the 1-2MMTPA, so won't move the needle as much. Still, this strong of a pressure on the demand, even in the face of large shale opportunities, would certainly affect pricing.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>